Trump plans to reduce the educational department; Financial aid fate unclear

Trump plans to reduce the educational department; Financial aid fate unclear

President Trump signaled his plans on Tuesday to reduce the Ministry of Education, and said that he had told secretary Linda McMahon that he wanted them to “emit themselves out of the job”, and he would work with congress and teacher unions, to be handed over to his goal to be handed over to the states.

“I believe in the choice of school, but I also want the states to lead schools and I want Linda to get out of a job,” said Trump at an Oval Office press conference.

He has not issued any executive order that is committed to eliminating the department in a campaign promise and states that the process would develop with the congress. When asked whether he would like to issue a command, Trump said: “I think I would work with the congress … We would have to work with the teacher association because the teacher union is the only one that opposes itself. “”

McMahon, a former pro-wrestling mogul and small business champion, has not yet been confirmed.

The prospect of reducing the Ministry of Education has led to questions and fears about potential chaos, as important responsibilities and billions of federal finance – including the processing of federal support, the subsidies for disadvantaged students and the enforcement of civil rights – would be affected.

The department has authority about financial lifestyle that rely on so many locations and students. The department’s K-12 programs look after more than 50 million students who attend 130,000 public and private schools. Federal grants, loan and work support support assistance benefit more than 13 million post-secondary students.

Student loans also fall under the authority of the department. Conservatives have criticized the student loan process, and the Republican states successfully sued the bidges because of their numerous attempts to terminate the bale debts of the bale debts of the country’s bale debts. According to the educational department, the government of more than 43 million Americans owes more than 1.5 trillion dollars of student loans.

California trust in federal funds

California has a massive part of how the department is operated. The state receives more than $ 2.1 billion in title I grants in order to counter the effects of poverty-more than any other state with $ 417 million on Los Angeles Unified, the country’s second largest school system, according to Information from the California Ministry of Education.

More than 200,000 students with low income at California State University System, the country’s largest and most diverse four-year university school system, rely on $ 1 billion in federal pellets annually to do college. At the University of California, more than 80,000 students received Pell grants of around $ 454 million in the academic year 2023-24.

But Trump and many Republicans have long acted against the federal department as wasteful and ineffective and argued that education should be handled at the state and local level of families.

The opponents have sworn to fight against every executive that would eliminate the department.

“If it is a reality, Trump’s power -grave would steal resources for our most endangered students, explode class sizes, shorten professional training programs, make university education more expensive and not be within reach for families, special debt services for students with them and Darmstudent civil rights protection ”, National Education Assn. President Becky Pringle said in a statement on Monday. “The Americans did not vote for the commitment of the Federal Government for each child and did not support to end the Federal Government’s commitment.”

What role does the congress play?

It would be an enormous and complicated task to change or redirect the countless functions of the department that will receive federal funds on every school district, every college and every university.

Many people wonder whether Trump has the authority to reduce a department created by the congress or to refuse to provide funds that are appropriated by the federal legislator. There are also legal questions about whether the President can transfer functions from a government branch to another one. If the consent of the congress is necessary, the Republicans have only close majorities in the house and the Senate, and a potential democratically guided filibuster in the Senate could block the move.

Michael Petrilli, President of the right Thomas B. Fordham Institute Denkfabrik Thomas B. Fordham, said that the closure of the department was “rather hypothetical”.

“It would need an act of the congress to reduce the department and simply not to have the votes, let alone the fact that it would be an unpopular step in many Republican districts,” he said.

In 2023, 60 Republican-Darunter five out of 11 Californians with 205 Democrats voted against a change that would have expressed the support of the congress for the end of the authority of the Ministry of Education to manage K-12 programs. The change, which was considered a forerunner for the abolition of the department, failed.

The debate about the role of the federal government in education is not new.

The Ministry of Education was first founded by President Andrew Jackson in 1867, but was abolished a year later and its functions were summarized in other parts of the federal government. Democratic President Jimmy Carter asked the Congress to restore an independent department in 1979. His republican successor Ronald Reagan tried to remove it, but was unsuccessful. The efforts to Axen have continued since then, including a law that was introduced last month by the US representative David Rouzer (Rn.C.).

Rick Hess, Senior Fellow and Director of Education Policy Studies at the American Enterprise Institute, said defamed responsibilities. For example, he and Petrilli have questioned why educational bureaucrats should manage a trillion-dollar-student loan sports folio and no financial experts in the finance department-one of project 2025. Administration.

But Liz Sanders, a spokesman for the California Ministry of Education, commented on every attempt to abolish the department.

“We are incredibly concerned about what a thoughtless approach seems to be changing essential Federal Federal Programs that support our children every day – and support our most endangered children every day. We are talking about essential academic support services, ”said Sanders. “We would like to ensure that these services have continuity for our educators and our families and our students. A single bei -job with a send is not the way we should make changes that affect our children. “

At the moment, educational managers are waiting for clearer signs of what Trump intends.

“When it comes to reducing costs and programs, the move would have a major impact,” said Pedro Noguera, Dean of the USC Rossier School of Education. “When it comes to moving tasks and the people they carry to other agencies, it is difficult to see that the costs are reduced.

“It is difficult to know what will happen or why it happens because they were not really clear about the strategy whether there was one.”

(Tagstotranslate) Education Department (T) Trump

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *